Habakkuk climbs before he writes. Scholars place him in the reign of King Jehoiakim, 609 to 597 BC. The prophet carries a hard question up the steps of a watchtower in Judah and plants his feet on stone. Babylon gathers strength in the east. God already named the threat to him, in words the King James translators set down four centuries ago.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation.Habakkuk 1:6 ◆ KJV
Habakkuk takes the watchman's post and waits for an answer.
I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me.Habakkuk 2:1 ◆ KJV
God answers with an assignment.
And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.Habakkuk 2:2 ◆ KJV
Look hard at the word tables. Hebrew scribes wrote luchot there, and that same noun names the two slabs Moses carried down from Sinai, the tables of stone, written with the finger of God.
The verb behind make it plain
, ba'er, starts with digging and stretches toward engraving. God does not ask Habakkuk to jot a note. God asks him to cut the vision into a surface built to outlast his hand.
I kept a post like his for thirty years. I trained at Stabroek News in Georgetown. I founded Kaieteur News and its publishing company, launched two community newspapers in Canada, and wrote a Stabroek News column called Ways of Looking and Feeling. Journalists watch for a living. We climb to the wall of the day, report what we see, and hand it to strangers by morning. That trade drilled the watchtower into my bones. It never taught me what Habakkuk learned next: a watchman who writes for tomorrow's reader outlives the morning edition.
This essay stakes three claims, and I sign my name under each. First, the library we call the Bible works as a textbook for life, and its deepest lessons train a creature of dust to rise into the breath of God. Second, the same library holds a page for every person, a calling that a sincere seeker can find in communion with the Holy Spirit. Third, God keeps choosing the word, the book, and the act of publishing to carry that calling across generations. Habakkuk braids the three strands into one rope. I testify that his vision reached my hands, and I accept its charge with humility and a deep sense of divine responsibility.
01Dust first, then breath
Start with the word Bible. It comes from the Greek ta biblia, the books, a plural noun. Christians carry a library inside one binding: sixty-six books in the Protestant canon, written across many centuries by kings, shepherds, prophets, fishermen, and, by tradition, a tax collector and a physician.
Most readers shelve that library under religion. I shelve it under instruction. Paul calls Scripture profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
and a good textbook does that work: it explains, corrects, trains, and tests. Every textbook teaches a subject. This one teaches a person how to live as the creature God intended, and it opens the lesson in its second chapter.
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.Genesis 2:7 ◆ KJV
Watch the order of events. God shapes dust first, and dust lies still. Then God breathes, and the clay rises as a living soul. Hebrew blurs breath and spirit on purpose. Genesis 2 speaks of neshamah, breath, and elsewhere the single word ruach names wind, breath, and spirit at once. Elihu sets the two words side by side in the Book of Job.
The spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.Job 33:4 ◆ KJV
My first instinct pairs beingness and spirit as twins. Scripture asks for more precision, and I follow its lead. It never swaps the two words. It ties every human life to God's breath instead, so that no one lives, moves, or stands apart from the Spirit who animates the dust. Paul made the point to philosophers on the Areopagus in Athens, men who argued about existence in the abstract. He told them God giveth to all life, and breath, and all things,
and then he pressed the claim closer to the skin.
For in him we live, and move, and have our being.Acts 17:28 ◆ KJV
Two modern thinkers mapped this ground from outside the pulpit. Erich Fromm, the psychoanalyst, split human life into two modes in 1976. His having mode grabs, stores, and guards: money, titles, even people. The second mode, which Fromm named for existence itself, loves, shares, and produces. Fromm drew much of that contrast from the Hebrew Bible and the Gospels, and he warned that a consumer society trains most people into the first mode. Open any feed on any phone and you watch his warning play out in real time.
Martin Heidegger pressed the same question from the philosopher's chair. He gave the human creature a German name in 1927: Dasein, a word that plants each of us in a particular spot, thrown into a particular time. He wrote twenty years later that language shelters human existence the way a house shelters a family: In its home human beings dwell.
Then the record halts me. Heidegger took the rector's chair at the University of Freiburg in 1933 and joined the Nazi Party. A man who mapped human existence with rare care still lent his name to Hitler's program. Philosophy of existence failed to make him a good man. Scripture never lets existence and righteousness drift into separate rooms. It asks whom you worship, whom you love, and what you do with your neighbour's life. That binding sends me back to Scripture as the textbook, with the philosophers as commentators in the margin.
I came to this question through two doors. I trained as a certified life coach in the ontological method, which studies how the words a person speaks about the self shape the way that person shows up in the world. I also studied theology at Tyndale in Toronto, working toward a Master of Divinity. Both rooms taught me one lesson from opposite walls: a person lives out of the sentences he or she speaks about the self, and God wrote the first sentence.
02The name that moves
Now climb a second mountain. Moses keeps his father-in-law's sheep near Horeb when a bush catches fire and refuses to turn to ash. God tells him to take off his shoes, then sends him to Pharaoh. Moses asks for a name to carry back to a nation of slaves. God answers in three Hebrew words, ehyeh asher ehyeh, and the King James Bible renders them this way.
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.Exodus 3:14 ◆ KJV
Greek translators of the Septuagint turned the phrase into ego eimi ho on, a formula for the uncaused One. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas built a towering theology on that reading: God as pure, unchanging existence, the ground beneath everything that lives. Western theology inherited its word for God, and its word for us, from that translation.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks named what the Greek dropped. Ehyeh speaks in the Hebrew imperfect, a tense that leans forward into what God will do. The plain sense runs close to a promise: watch what I do next, and you will learn my name. Sacks called the speaker the God of the future tense.
Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig, translating the Torah into German, heard presence in the same verb: a God who will show up, there, beside his people.
Here the essay turns on its hinge. God's name, the name at the centre of Western ontology, refuses to sit still. God answers the question of identity with a verb that reaches into the future and promises presence. So the beingness Scripture asks of us carries motion at its centre. In the Bible's grammar, a person lives less like a noun and more like a verb. We rise into our beingness the way Moses rose from the sheepfold: by answering, going, speaking, and walking where the Presence walks.
Readers ask why I write every essay without a single English form of the verb to be
. Part of my answer lives in Hebrew. Biblical Hebrew builds much of its present tense with no linking verb at all, a structure grammarians call the noun clause. Hayah, the Hebrew verb of existence, leans toward happening and arriving. King James translators rendered one of its forms again and again as and it came to pass
. I adopted my discipline for clarity and force. Hebrew showed me that the discipline sits close to the grammar of the God who answered Moses.